Skip to main content

The Boy Who Cried "Wolf"

Hi, I'm James Carmen Daniels, but you can call me Jimmy! Or not, since this isn't a dialogue. Anywho, I will be talking about childhood stories and lying. Enjoy (or don't, I don't really care).

     As a child, my mom always read me a handful of stories before bed, like Little Red Riding Hood and Beauty and the Beast. But the one that I always looked forward to was The Boy Who Cried "Wolf". I liked the story because of its surprising (and rather unpleasant) ending. It wasn't this "happily ever-after" ending; it was a shocking one. 

    As I grew older, I began to question the true moral of the story. So, it's clear that the boy continues to cry "Wolf" for the fun of it, despite the reaction being fairly predictable. But the moral is a bit blurred. It can't be "don't lie" because it obviously worked the first time. Therefore, an appropriate moral of the story would be "don't overuse the same lie; be creative". For instance, maybe he should've cried "LION!" to spice it up a bit. Nonetheless, you may argue that the townspeople would still ignore such a ridiculous statement, but I would argue that the lie is just different enough to spark at least a couple townspeople. Maybe they would set up a rotational schedule where some townspeople would check every time.

Since we're on the topic of lying, here is a liar (who is holding up COVID relief payments in order to insure corporation payout before working class survival).

    I don't think lying is a good thing at all...but it is pretty useful. The boy in "The Boy Who Cried "Wolf" lied in a very useless manner, though. He just wanted to see the townspeople reaction over and over. Thus, he kind of deserved what came to him due to his repetitive nature and lack of creativity. Lying can come in handy though. If, for example, you forget to turn an assignment in on time, you can simply say "my Wi-Fi wasn't working" and get away with it. Due to the lack of hyper-advanced technology and time, the teacher won't actually be able to tell if your Wi-Fi wasn't working, so he/she will probably give you the benefit of the doubt (unless the teacher is a math teacher). So let's take a closer examination on what your lie did: it saved you a grade, it bought you time to improve your assignment, and you paid no expense (except the scarring moral-bankruptcy you instilled within yourself that may crescendo into bigger long-term communication problems). We can get all into how the perception connects with the definition of lying and what really constructs a "lie" (for instance, if one person is saying something that is not true but that he/she perceives it to be, is he/she lying?).

    In short, lie sometimes. Like if it's pretty evident that lying is a win situation for all, then lie. Now, here's a Louis C.K. clip on lying that I found pretty funny (I do not, however, endorse this man but I do believe that the art and artist should be separated).Click on this -->Lying!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Political Polarization

From Arnold Carpet.  I  feel like politics is analogous to someone walking on a rope. Similar to how both sides get polarized and start pushing, the walker will lean one way and too much another and eventually fall. The polarization, by the way, is a mere indication that something isn't right and one side is responding by pushing traditional ways of life and the other is responding with a cry for urgent change. In America, however, there are three major players rather than two: the "crazy" left, the Democrats, and the Republicans.      This week, I listened to Noam Chomsky's podcast on "Free Will" and read a bit of  Brave New World  by Aldous Huxley .  Afterwards, I realized that in modern times, political polarization drives individuals to believe that politics is black and white, rather than a sea of different ideologies. It's almost inevitable with a two party system. Democrats do this and Republicans do this, but in reality, the...

Institutional Complexity

 From Arnold Carpet. Proving something complex right is one of the hardest tasks.     This week, I analyzed the complexity of Oedipus: his virtues, his morals, the way he presents himself, etc. This led me to think about complexity in general and since I have been reading and watching a lot of politics, I will be applying it to politics. Take any heated issue today such as gun rights, taxes, etc. and break it down to its fundamentals. That is something many of us don't do. Yet so many of us feel so strongly about certain topics. We are so sure of our stance, yet we can't really explain what the topic is. Skepticism and humility are crucial in solving the hatred that stems out of politics today. Do real research. Do not simply cherry-pick, but read what doesn't agree with your stance. Then, and only then, can you have a true opinion. Radicalism borne from entertainment is unfortunately widespread.     Take a concept like democratic socialism. In the United S...

The Golden Arches

    Hello, I'm Arnold Carpet. I'm a writer, columnist, and a proclaimed philosopher. Today, I will be examining a Banksy sculpture of Ronald McDonald and relating it to corporatism. I believe we will be seeing each other often.  The persistent march of corporatism has suffocated the people with a creativity-draining occupation while drowning them with a flood of debt, convincing the working class that money and "hard work" are they key to the desired lifestyle.     Satire is defined as "a literary work holding up human vices and follies to ridicule or scorn"   and it fits the Banksy sculpture of Ronald McDonald very well. In a country governed by companies and corporations where lobbyists sway politics, the working class is convinced that the poor are the main enemy; the working class is constantly being told that their hard-earned money is being depleted by social welfare programs. The reality is, politicians and news outlets ...